Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Chitra, N.
- Prey Preference of Orthopteran Predators on Rice Insect Pests
Abstract Views :230 |
PDF Views:126
Authors
Affiliations
1 Agricultural Research Station, Ramanathapuram 623 501, Tamil Nadu, IN
2 Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641 003, Tamil Nadu, IN
1 Agricultural Research Station, Ramanathapuram 623 501, Tamil Nadu, IN
2 Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore 641 003, Tamil Nadu, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 16, No 2 (2002), Pagination: 109-112Abstract
The predatory potential of the orthopteran predators viz., Conocephalus longipennis (de Haan), C, maculatus Le Guiilou, Anaxipha longipennis Serv. and Metioche vittaticollis (Stal) against the eggs of rice insect pests was studied under laboratory conditions. M. vittaticollis proved to be an effective predator on the eggs of rice leaf folders (Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenee) and Marasmia patnalis (Bradley) and rice moth, Corcyra cephalonica (Stainton), while C. longipennis and C. maculatus fed voraciously on the eggs of rice stem borer (Scirpophaga incertulas Walker) and rice earhead bug, Leptocorisa acuta (Thunberg), M. vittaticollis did not feed on stem borer eggs while C. longipennis and C. maculatus did not prefer to feed on leaf folder eggs. A. longipennis fed on all the eggs tested along with rice leaves but never on Corcyra eggs.Keywords
Egg Predators, Orthopteran, Rice Insects.- A Study on Five Sampling Methods of Parasitic Hymenopterans in Rice Ecosystem
Abstract Views :294 |
PDF Views:148
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641003, Tamil Nadu, IN
2 Director of Research, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641003, Tamil Nadu, IN
3 Department of Plant Biotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641003, Tamil Nadu, IN
4 Department of Rice, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641003, Tamil Nadu, IN
5 Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore -641003, Tamil Nadu, IN
1 Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641003, Tamil Nadu, IN
2 Director of Research, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641003, Tamil Nadu, IN
3 Department of Plant Biotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641003, Tamil Nadu, IN
4 Department of Rice, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore - 641003, Tamil Nadu, IN
5 Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore -641003, Tamil Nadu, IN
Source
Journal of Biological Control, Vol 32, No 3 (2018), Pagination: 187-192Abstract
For insect diversity studies to be of value, the sampling methods employed must produce samples representative of the community or taxon selected for the investigation. However, as yet, few evaluations on the variability and effectiveness of sampling methods have been undertaken. The survey was carried out in the rice fields during 2015-16 in Paddy Breeding Station, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore. From this study a total of 1,019 parasitoid individuals were collected. Among six different collection methods employed for sampling hymenopteran parasitoids in rice ecosystem, the yellow pan trap at ground level was found to be the most effective method in trapping the parasitoids (27.2 ± 2.56 parasitoids per day) followed by sweep net method (12.1 ± 1.03 parasitoids per day). The next best sampling method is yellow pan trap erected at canopy level which recorded a mean of 9.2 ± 2.26 parasitoids per day. The other three traps viz., malaise trap, suction trap and light trap were found to collect less number (<1.5) of parasitoids per day.Keywords
Efficiency, Parasitoids, Rice, Sampling, Traps.References
- Campbell JW, Hanula JL. 2007. Efficiency of malaise traps and colored pan traps for collecting flower visiting insects from three forested ecosystems. J Insect Conserv. 11: 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841006-9055-4
- Daniel JA, Ramaraju K. 2017. A study of three methods of sampling chalcididae and Pteromalidae In Major Rice Ecosystems of Tamil Nadu. J Exp Zool India 20(2): 1037–1041.
- Darling DC, Packer L. 1988. Effectiveness of Malaise traps in collecting Hymenoptera: the influence of trap design, mesh size and location. Can Entomol. 120: 787–796. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent120787-8
- Devigne C, Biseau J. 2014. Urban ecology: Comparison of the effectiveness of five traps commonly used to study the biodiversity of flying insects. Biodivers J. 5: 165–174.
- Fritz LL, Heinrichs EA, Machado V, Andreis TF, Pandolfo M, Salles SM, Oliveira, JV. 2011. Diversity and abundance of arthropods in subtropical rice growing areas in the Brazilian south. Biodivers Conserv. 20(10): 2211–2224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0083-3
- Heckman CW. 1979. Rice field ecology in North East Thailand. Monogr Biol. 34: 228.
- Heong KL, Aquino GB, Barrion AT. 1991. Arthropod community structures of rice ecosystems in the Philippines. Bull. Entomol Res. 81(4): 407–416. https://doi. org/10.1017/S0007485300031977
- Hollingworth JP, Hartstack AWT, Lingren PD. 1970. The spectral response of Campoletis perdistinctus. J Econ Entomol. 63: 1758–1761. https://doi.org/10.1093/ jee/63.6.1758
- Jervis DI, Padoch C, Cooper HD. 2007. Managing biodiversity in agricultural ecosystems. Columbia University Press. pp. 34–76. https://doi.org/10.7312/jarv13648 Jonathan JK. 2006. Ichneumonologia Indica, Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae. Zool Suru India, Kolkata. 160p.
- Kennedy JS, Booth C, Kershaw WJS. 1961. Host finding by aphids in the field by visual attraction. Ann Appl Biol. 49: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1961.tb03587.x
- Kirk WD. 1984. Ecologically selective coloured traps. Ecol Entomol. 9: 35–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.19 84.tb00696.x
- La Salle J, Gauld ID. 1993. Hymenoptera: Their diversity and their impact on the diversity of other organisms. In: Lasalle J and Gauld, ID. (Eds.). Hymenoptera and biodiversity. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. pp. 1–26.
- Narendran TC. 1994. Torymidae and Eurytomidae of Indian subcontinent (Hymenoptera: Chalcidoidea). Zoological monograph. Calicut. 493p.
- Narendran TC. 2001. Parasitic Hymenoptera and biological control: Palani Paramount Publications, Palani, India. pp. 6–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1377-3_1
- Noyes JS. 1989. A study of five methods of sampling Hymenoptera (Insecta) in a tropical rainforest, with special reference to the Parasitica. J Nat Hist. 23: 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222938900770181
- Noyes JS. 2017. Universal Chalcidoidea Database. World Wide Web electronic publication. Retreived from: hhtp:// www.nhm.ac.uk/chalcidoids.
- Rajmohana K. 2006. Studies on Proctotrupoidea and Platygastroidea (Hymenoptera: Insecta) of Kerala.
- Memoirs Zool Surv India. 2(1): 1–53.
- Shweta M, Rajmohana K. 2016. A comparison of efficiencies of sweep net, yellow pan trap and malaise trap in sampling Platygastridae (Hymenoptera: Insecta). J Exp Zool India. 19: 393–396.
- Spafford RD, Lortie CJ. 2013. Sweeping beauty: is grassland arthropod community composition effectively estimated by seep netting? Ecol Evol. 3: 3347–3358. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.688
- Sureshan PM. 2008. Pteromalinae (Pteromalidae: Chalcidoidea: Hymenoptera) of Indian Subcontinent. Rec zool Surv India 205: 1–170.
- Wells W, Decker T. 2006. A comparison of three types of insect traps for collecting non-Formicidae Hymenoptera on the Island of Dominica. Southwest. Entomology 31: 59–68.